Tracking Docket FAA-2025-1908 RIN 2120-AL82 Status At OIRA UTC --:--:--
SkyDroneNewsSkyDroneNews.com

Part 108 reaches OIRA, the last stop before routine BVLOS

The rule that decides whether drone delivery, pipeline inspection and long-corridor mapping become ordinary businesses or stay waiver-dependent hobbies is now in the hands of White House regulatory reviewers. It has been a long walk to get here.

Where it stands

On 10 July 2026 the FAA's final Part 108 rule was filed with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. That is the last significant procedural stop before a rule publishes in the Federal Register. OIRA's review of significant rules can take up to 90 days, which puts a realistic publication window in late 2026 or early 2027 rather than the July target the Unified Agenda had carried.

Getting to this point took three years and two missed deadlines. The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 set a statutory deadline of January 2026 for a final BVLOS rule. A separate executive order in June 2025 directed the agency to propose and finalise within 240 days. The proposal itself, jointly published with TSA, landed on 7 August 2025 under docket FAA-2025-1908. Roughly 3,100 comments came back by the October close, an enormous response for a specialised aviation rule, and more than half of them concentrated on a handful of contested questions. The agency reopened comments on those specific topics in January 2026 for a two-week window. A 43-day government shutdown consumed much of the remaining schedule.

What actually changes

The core of Part 108 is a shift in who carries the burden of proof. Under Part 107, a remote pilot keeps the aircraft in visual line of sight and anything beyond that requires a waiver argued case by case. Part 108 replaces that with a standing framework: an organisation demonstrates trained personnel, documented risk controls and qualifying equipment once, and then operates inside an approved area rather than filing per-flight paperwork.

The structural pieces as proposed:

  • Two approval tiers. Permitted Operations for lower-risk profiles, and an Operational Certificate for anything more demanding.
  • Risk categories keyed to population density. Five bands, so flying a corridor across farmland is not held to the same standard as flying over a suburb.
  • Area approvals replacing per-flight waivers. The single biggest operational change for anyone running a fleet.
  • New named roles. An Operations Supervisor and a Flight Coordinator, formalising the org chart the FAA expects to see.
  • Equipment mandates. Detect-and-avoid, Remote ID, continuous position tracking, and integration with UTM traffic management.
  • Manufacturer-led airworthiness. Manufacturers demonstrate airworthiness rather than the FAA issuing a type certificate, a materially faster path than traditional certification.
  • A weight ceiling of 1,320 pounds, far above anything in the consumer conversation.

The fight that is still live

The reopened comment window in January targeted the genuinely unresolved questions: ADS-B Out equipage, alternative electronic conspicuity devices, detect-and-avoid requirements and right-of-way. Those are not technicalities. Right-of-way in particular asks who yields when an uncrewed aircraft and a crewed one occupy the same low airspace, and the crewed aviation community and the drone industry gave the FAA very different answers. Expect the final text to differ from the proposal on at least some of these points. Nobody outside the agency knows how much.

If you fly, what to do now

  1. Do not wait for publication to build the paperwork. The safety management, training records and documented procedures Part 108 will ask for take months to stand up and are useful regardless.
  2. Budget a transition period. Industry expectation is 6 to 12 months between publication and requirements taking effect. That is planning time, not a reprieve.
  3. Keep flying under Part 107. Nothing about Part 107 changes when Part 108 publishes. Existing waivers stay valid on their own terms.
  4. Watch the equipment side. Detect-and-avoid and conspicuity mandates interact awkwardly with the FCC's restrictions on foreign-produced drones and components. Compliance-capable hardware from a supply chain that will still exist in three years is a narrower category than it was in 2024.
Related The hardware side of this is its own problem. See what the FCC Covered List did to the market and our rules tracker for current status on every open item.

Sources

  • Aviation Week, rolling business aviation briefs, 4 August 2026 — Part 108 filed with OIRA
  • Airdata, Part 108 timeline and status, July 2026 — airdata.com
  • DLA Piper, industry response to the Part 108 NPRM — dlapiper.com
  • Federal Register, 90 FR 38212, Docket FAA-2025-1908, RIN 2120-AL82
Standing caveat Part 108 is not final until it publishes. Every provision described here comes from the proposal and may change. This is journalism, not legal advice.

Disclaimers

Amazon Associates

SkyDroneNews.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. You pay the same price whether you use our link or not. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Affiliate links and FTC disclosure

Links marked "Affiliate link" are paid links. If you buy through one, we may receive a commission. We disclose this above every set of product links rather than only here, as US Federal Trade Commission guidance requires disclosure close to the recommendation.

Commission rates never influence what we recommend. We accept no payment for reviews, placements or favourable coverage. Full terms in our affiliate disclosure.

Prices and availability

We do not display prices. Amazon prices and stock change constantly, and the Associates Operating Agreement does not permit publishers to show static price or review data taken from the site. The price shown at Amazon checkout is the price that applies.

Advertising

This site shows advertising served by Google and its partners. Ad units are labelled "Advertisement" and kept visually separate from editorial content. Third-party vendors, including Google, use cookies to serve ads based on your prior visits to this and other sites.

Opt out of personalised advertising at Google Ads Settings or aboutads.info/choices. See our privacy and cookies policy.

Not legal or aviation advice

Everything here is journalism. It is not legal advice, aviation advice or professional consultation, and reading it creates no advisory relationship of any kind.

US drone regulation is being rewritten continuously. Rules described as pending may have published, effective dates move, and state and local law adds requirements we do not cover. Verify with the FAA, the FCC, the Federal Register and your own counsel before you fly, buy or act. Compliance is your responsibility.

Counter-drone content

We describe counter-UAS law and deliberately decline to explain how to build, obtain or operate jamming, spoofing or mitigation equipment, and we do not link to it.

Operating, marketing or selling a device designed to interfere with authorised radio transmissions is prohibited under the Communications Act, and the FAA treats drones as aircraft, so damaging one is a federal aviation offence. Nothing here should be read as encouragement to interfere with any aircraft or transmission.

Accuracy and corrections

We work from primary sources and cite them, and we still get things wrong sometimes. Dates on articles reflect when the claims were current. Report an error to corrections@skydronenews.com and we will fix the page and note what changed.

Third parties and warranties

We link to external sites, including retailers, which we do not control and are not responsible for. Referring to a product is not a claim of affiliation with or endorsement by its maker; third-party trademarks belong to their owners.

This site is provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. To the fullest extent permitted by law we are not liable for damages arising from your use of it or reliance on its content.

Last reviewed 6 August 2026 · Disclosure · Privacy · Terms